List

Summary

Financing Lean Development requires both institutional and non-institutional sources of capital. This paper focuses on project equity from non-institutional sources. Years of observations and anecdotal conversations with developers of small, innovative projects suggest that Lean Development is coming of age, but it has significant hurdles to realizing its potential, and financing is among the more difficult to overcome. Understanding the motivations, requirements and techniques for working with non-institutional investors is critical to overcoming one of the primary hurdles for Lean Development.

 Back to All Publications
 Download the PDF

Equity vs. Debt

Any development deal, Lean or otherwise, can be boiled down to two primary sources of capital: equity and debt. Equity usually comprises the first dollars in and last dollars out, meaning it holds the highest risk of any project’s financing. Because it holds more risk, return expectations are higher. But with sufficient equity in a deal, debt can be easier to secure. While the mix of equity and debt (the “capital stack”) varies from project to project, a traditional project’s capital stack might be 20 to 40 percent equity and 80 to 60 percent debt. Because equity begets debt, securing equity is the starting point for any successful development project. Andrew Frey’s paper, “Low-Fat Vanilla Finance,” details the information that any sources of equity will want to see.


The Challenge of Institutional Capital Sources

Speaking at the 2014 Urban Land Institute Small Scale Developers Forum, Brett Wilkerson, Managing Director at Hawkeye Partners, pointed out that 50 percent of all institutional equity (trillions of dollars) is controlled by just 25 advisors. With so much capital to place, it is understandable that doing a single deal for $100 million could be preferable to doing 100 deals of $1 million each, even though the latter may have lower volatility and greater diversified returns. In addition, institutional capital sources have very low risk profiles and very high expectations for experience and skill sets. The projects that motivate Lean developers, and the attributes that help them succeed, are not always the qualities that institutional capital sources seek.


Alternative Sources

Some Lean Development projects can access conventional capital relatively easily because the project profile, modeled returns, market momentum and experience of the team is easily underwritten. But for more innovative projects, in unproven markets, or teams with limited experience, non-institutional capital sources may be the only route to realizing a project. Some of these include:

  • Friends and family: Many small projects start with a simple capitalization from family members because that is often the lowest-hanging fruit. Be aware, however, that multiple capital units of less than $50,000 can make it difficult to get to scale without spending an inordinate amount of time managing investor relations. Even friends and family expect to be kept up to date on progress, receiving high-quality accurate reports on how the money is being used and where the project budgets and schedule stand.
  • High-net-worth (HNW) individuals: An example is an “accredited investor,” commonly described as having an investable net worth of at least $1 million and annual income in excess of $250,000. For HNW investors, this is generally an opportunistic business proposition, and returns need to be commensurate.
  • Family offices: This is the term for operations that manage the legacy assets of wealthy families. Family offices seeking to define or enhance their missions while creating long-term returns may be better candidates for Lean, pioneering projects if both mission and goals are aligned. But they will not invest on emotion only; there has to be a credible business proposition and assessment of risk.
  • Foundations: In addition to grants, many foundations make program-related investments to further their missions, looking for return of capital and return on investment, albeit at a lower rate than conventional investors. Lean developers who can demonstrate that their projects satisfy both requirements may find foundations to be good sources of patient capital.
  • Grants, tax credits, etc.: The equity sources in this catch-all category require no return and less investor management once the placement is consummated, but the up-front work is extensive in time and effort. However, mastering the intricacies of effective grant writing and reporting, historic tax credits, new market tax credits, conservation easements, etc., creates intellectual property that adds value to your enterprise and can be used in subsequent projects.

How to Find Them

Non-institutional investors aren’t found with a quick Google search. It takes time, patience and extensive networking. It is not like securing a home mortgage, which is highly commoditized. Obtaining project equity is often an obtuse, opaque, non-linear and non-standardized process. But common traits among non-institutional investors do exist. For example, as long as the business fundamentals are covered, non-institutional investors might be more interested in the emotional and social dimensions of a Lean investment that creates good neighborhoods. Developing your own “private pool” of investors takes time, high levels of relationship management, and a keen sense of understanding investor needs. Building a deliberate and rigorous search methodology will help you build long-term enterprise value because you will come to understand the subtleties of how the industry works.


What Do They Want?

Non-conventional investors want to be part of something. Foundations and other impact investors want to see lives changed by their investments. For individuals, investing in small deals can be exciting. Many of them were entrepreneurs themselves, and they like seeing new ideas. Many young entrepreneurial developers have found “patrons” in older, accomplished business persons who want to see the next generation succeed.

They want something tangible. Stocks and bonds can be obtuse and incomprehensible. But real estate is tangible. They get to see drawings become reality. They can visit the site and see it being constructed. And then it produces cash. What’s not to like?

They want the bad news and the good news. You are not selling a product; you are creating a relationship. The basis of that relationship is trust, and to maintain that trust you have to be an active communicator. As one investor told me, “It’s not how you act when things are going well — it’s how you act when things go bad.” That’s when you establish your credibility and investors decide if they will reinvest with you.

And of course they want to be confident that they won’t lose money. How can you provide that confidence?

  • Have an exit strategy. If the rental market goes soft, can your apartment project be converted to condos? Can your retail project accommodate other uses if that market takes a dip? What is the value of the underlying land as is, should you have a fire sale, and how much money can you give back to investors at that point? Dreaming big but anticipating the worst is how you protect your investors and yourself.
  • Bring in an experienced partner. Investors want to know how you plan to manage risk, and for many, execution risk — whether you can build what you say you will, on time and in budget — is at the top of the list. Few will agree to let you learn on the job with their money. Having an experienced partner at your side will add credibility and provide you with the learning opportunity you need.
  • Show that you know the market. Andrew Frey provides instructions for conducting a market study in his paper on creating a financial model. If it is a pioneering project, don’t rely on conventional market analysis. Also show that you know the competition.

Approaching Investors – Some Dos and Don’ts

Non-institutional investors have motivations and investment styles that are different from those of conventional capital sources. Keep the following in mind when approaching them.

  • Know the difference between investors and lenders. They have different risk/reward profiles and require different levels of security. With the right investors behind you, it’s much easier to find your lenders. The reverse is not true.
  • Understand investor motivations. Are they looking for steady return? Are they looking for a home run? Are they interested in being a part of something important? Know what motivates them before developing your pitch.
  • Understand that reducing risk reduces the cost of capital. Demonstrate reduced risk based on your own skill, the partnerships you have created, or the ability to provide various exit strategies depending on market scenarios.
  • Don’t emphasize the innovative aspects of your project. Lean developers are motivated by new paradigms, but to lenders and investors, innovation implies higher risk. Save that for the sales staff, not the investment community.
  • Don’t confuse passion with knowledge. Passion can get people to listen, but also must have command of the facts. Show that you understand the deal — the risks, the potential rewards, how one’s money is protected, and the implications of various scenarios.
  • Know when to stop pitching and start listening. Assume your potential investors make good decisions, are street smart, and have good intuition. If they ask questions, given them serious consideration. If they offer advice, take it — it’s free.
Jim Heid

Jim Heid

Jim Heid is a real estate developer, adviser, and author whose focus is the creation of new communities that contribute to their environment, region, and residents. In 2000, he founded UrbanGreen to act as a development partner and adviser to legacy landowners, institutions, and land development companies that embrace principles of sustainability. He is motivated by the need to deliver high-quality developments to a broader market — in an increasingly complex world of entitlements and financing — without compromising environmental, economic, or place-making objectives.

More Posts - Website

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  Publications

November 23rd, 2016

Tool Survey – Existing and Proposed

Lean Urbanism is a way to restore common sense to the processes of development, building, starting small businesses, community engagement, and acquiring the necessary skills. The Project for Lean Urbanism is collecting and developing tools and daylighting techniques to enable and encourage those activities. This collection is the result of a survey to identify tools developed elsewhere and to track ideas for those that are needed. As tools are developed by the Project for Lean Urbanism, they will be made freely available on this website.

November 4th, 2016

The Pink Zone – Where Small Is Possible

Summary

The Pink Zone is a powerful tool for concentrating resources on the task of enabling small-scale, community-centered development and revitalization. It defines an area of focus, leverages a suite of available tools, and provides a platform for the community to gather resources, make commitments, and work together on projects that enhance community character and allow existing businesses and residents to remain and profit from the improved quality of life. The Pink Zone tool will be developed and refined in a series of pilot projects, and then released to the public.

August 18th, 2015

Lessons from PHX – Embracing Lean Urbanism

Summary

The City of Phoenix has become a model of Lean Governing, demonstrating the benefits of community revitalization when a municipality enables and encourages the work of creative entrepreneurs, small developers, neighborhood leaders, and community organizations. Along the way, it has employed and refined a number of principles and techniques that other cities can use to revitalize their neighborhoods. Phoenix is demonstrating that small projects can lead to big results.

August 13th, 2015

The Lexicon of Lean Urbanism

Summary

The Lexicon of Lean Urbanism defines the “terms of art” and other useful words and phrases that have emerged from extended discussions on the online Lean Urbanism discussion group and at Lean Councils. The first section is dedicated to these terms, and the second presents a selection of helpful quotations.

July 29th, 2015

The Katrina Cottage Movement – A Case Study

Summary

Appealing, context-aware designs for small-scale homes in small-scale neighborhoods grabbed national attention during the 2005 Mississippi Renewal Forum after Hurricane Katrina. Though it took far longer for the ideas to find traction than anyone imagined, trial-and-error progress has produced models worth emulating, and just in time to address new realities in housing demand in post-recession America.

April 15th, 2015

Lean Urbanism and the Right to the City

Summary

The potential for a natural partnership between Lean Urbanism and social-justice groups is self-evident and should be explored. A growing movement of social-justice organizations across the world are coalescing behind the concept of “the right to the city” as a means to garner support for a wide range of social issues that can be characterized by a belief that everyone has a right to design and shape their community. These groups have the energy and determination to alter the status quo of financial and regulatory structures that prevent people who lack access to resources and capital, such as millennials and immigrants, from becoming active in small-scale development. But these groups often also lack the technical knowledge to achieve such goals. Lean Urbanism can provide tools and know-how that these groups need.

April 15th, 2015

Regulatory Barriers to Home Construction and Rehab

Summary

Regulatory barriers make housing less affordable to millions of households in the US and abroad. If regulatory barriers were reduced, small developers could provide housing at more affordable prices. This article assesses the current state of knowledge about the effects of federal, state, and local regulations on the supply and cost of housing.

April 7th, 2015

Low-Fat Vanilla Finance – A Simple Financial Model

Summary

New developers should create their own financial models. Only by doing so will they truly understand the variables and how each affects financial performance. This paper attempts to walk new developers through a financial model that includes development budget, annual return, and capital return. It is simple enough to create but sophisticated enough to present to investors and lenders. It represents one small residential rental building — not condo, and not office or retail.

April 6th, 2015

Lean Financing – Alternatives to Institutional Capital

Summary

Financing Lean Development requires both institutional and non-institutional sources of capital. This paper focuses on project equity from non-institutional sources. Years of observations and anecdotal conversations with developers of small, innovative projects suggest that Lean Development is coming of age, but it has significant hurdles to realizing its potential, and financing is among the more difficult to overcome. Understanding the motivations, requirements and techniques for working with non-institutional investors is critical to overcoming one of the primary hurdles for Lean Development.

April 3rd, 2015

Pilot Projects – Testing Tools, Building Platforms

Summary

The Lean Urbanism movement will come to life through pilot projects, as they will spread the knowledge from the professionals to community builders and entrepreneurs. They are at the core of the Project for Lean Urbanism, as they will serve to demonstrate the potential for and value of incremental, community-scale revitalization and development by tapping local physical, financial, and social assets that are currently underutilized. The pilot projects will also be used to test and refine the tools, to identify and seek solutions to common barriers in regulation or practice that inhibit small-scale development or rebuilding, and to serve as models for use by other communities.